Address
304 North Cardinal
St. Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Address
304 North Cardinal
St. Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Work Hours
Monday to Friday: 7AM - 7PM
Weekend: 10AM - 5PM
Who wrote this: This guide comes from the production team at Shaoxing Keqiao Lianyang Fabric Co., Ltd (Pura Fabric), a weft-knit fabric manufacturer established in 2010 in Keqiao, Shaoxing, China, operating 52 circular knitting machines across a 4,000 sqm facility. The specification logic below is the same checklist we use when we quote on our own floor.
Most fabric buying problems are not fabric problems. They are specification problems — the garment was designed without a weight, the weight was chosen without a construction, and the construction was named in a language the mill reads differently. This guide is a decision tool rather than a catalogue: it takes an end use and works backwards to the construction, the weight, the fibre and the finishing route that will actually produce it. It is written for buyers who need to specify, and for the ones who have to defend that specification to someone asking why it costs what it costs.
Buyers arrive with a fabric name in mind — terry, jersey, interlock, fleece — and then try to work backwards to a use. That direction produces expensive compromises, because fabric names describe how a fabric is built rather than what it is for. Two fabrics with the same name can be entirely wrong for the same garment, and the same fabric can be right for one garment and useless for another.
The reliable order is the reverse: fix the end use first, then the variables that end use actually depends on. A sweatshirt needs to insulate without weight, hold its shape after washing, and survive repeated pulls at the cuff. A swimsuit needs to stay light when wet, resist chlorine, and dry quickly. Those two end uses share almost no requirements, which is why specifying either one from a fabric name alone goes wrong.
| End use | The variable that decides the fabric | Constructions that work |
|---|---|---|
| Sweatshirt / hoodie | Warmth per gram, shape retention | French terry, loopback terry, brushed-back fleece |
| T-shirt / long sleeve | Hand feel and drape, colour fastness | Single jersey, interlock, slub jersey |
| Activewear / running | Moisture transport, quick dry | Plain knit, mesh, dry-fit interlock |
| Swimsuit / beachwear | Chlorine resistance, quick dry | Polyester elastane plain knit, mesh |
| Underwear / lining | Skin comfort, stretch recovery | Nylon elastane tricot, cotton-modal jersey |
| Fleece blanket / robe | Loft retention, warmth without weight | Three-layer fleece, brushed fleece |
| Bag / bag lining | Abrasion resistance, printability | Canvas, coarse interlock, ripstop |
Weight is the single most misused variable in fabric buying, because it is quoted as GSM without saying what it is weighing. GSM in fabric usage is grams per square metre, and the same fabric measured on a different scale, or at a different width, or after a finishing route that adds or removes weight, will not read the same. A fabric quoted at 240 GSM that has been brushed and relaxed may behave like a 280 GSM fabric, and a 240 GSM single jersey will not behave anything like a 240 GSM terry.
The useful conversion is weight per end use, not weight in isolation. These ranges are what actually lands in production for common end uses, and they assume the GSM is measured on the finished fabric, not on the greige.
| End use | Usable GSM range | What happens outside the range |
|---|---|---|
| Lightweight tee | 130–180 GSM | Below 130 drapes transparently; above 180 loses the dry hand |
| Midweight tee | 180–220 GSM | The most forgiving range; easiest to fit and cheapest to run |
| Heavyweight tee | 220–280 GSM | Above 280 needs a heavier yarn and starts to feel stiff |
| Sweatshirt body | 280–400 GSM | Below 280 lacks body; above 400 is a blanket |
| Fleece body | 260–340 GSM | Below 260 will not loft; above 350 becomes stiff when washed |
| Lining | 40–80 GSM | Very light, usually no construction detail worth specifying |
| Bag / outer | 200–400 GSM | Depends more on weave and finish than on weight |
Ask for the GSM measured on the finished, relaxed fabric, and state the width you want it measured across. A mill measuring on a narrow sample will quote a number that looks correct and arrives wrong. If the fabric will be brushed, peached, or washed before it ships, ask for the post-finish GSM, because that is the number your garment will be built around.
If you are still converting between weight and something else, our fabric GSM calculator covers the common conversions in one place.
If you have a target weight and a construction in mind but are not sure whether the two are compatible, send us the brief. We will tell you what is runnable on our machines, what the minimum order quantity is, and what lead time to plan around — before you commit the specification to a sample.
This is where most specification disputes originate. A 280 GSM fabric can be a dense loopback terry that stands up to a sweatshirt, or an open, loose single jersey that drapes like a bedsheet. Both are legitimately 280 GSM. The difference is construction, and construction is what a fabric name is supposed to tell you.
Three variables carry most of the meaning: the loop or pile density, the yarn character, and whether the face and back are the same construction. Density determines how much the fabric moves and how it insulates. Yarn character determines the hand and how it wears. A backed construction changes stability, opacity and how the garment washes.
| Construction | What it is | How it behaves | Typical use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single jersey | One layer of knit, open back | Drapes heavily, low recovery, often transparent | T-shirts, lining |
| Interlock | Two layers knitted together | Stable, smooth, opaque, good recovery | Premium tees, activewear |
| French terry | Loops on the face, flat back | Insulating, matte, soft inside | Sweatshirts, hoodies |
| Loopback terry | Dense loops both sides | Very stable, resists stretching | Premium sweatshirts |
| Three-layer fleece | Two faces plus a binder pile | Warm, holds loft, pilling risk if cheap fibre | Fleece, blankets |
| Terry with underface | Loops plus a bonded back | Heavier, more opaque, better recovery | Heavyweight hoodies |
Fibre choice constrains everything else. It decides what finishes are possible, how the fabric washes, how it drapes over time, and what you can credibly promise a customer. Cotton and polyester do not substitute for each other in any meaningful sense, and a fabric that tries to do both usually does neither well.
| Fibre | Strengths | Limitations | Best fit for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton | Breathable, absorbent, familiar hand, cheap | Shrinks if untreated, creases, weak when wet | Everyday tees, sweatshirts, towels |
| Polyester | Holds shape, quick dry, strong, colour stable | Less breathable, static, can pill | Activewear, lining, performance |
| Cotton–poly blend | Softer than pure poly, more stable than pure cotton | Ratio must be stated, blends need testing | Sweatshirt bodies, everyday activewear |
| Modal / viscose | Very soft, good drape, absorbent | Weak when wet, expensive, fibrillation in wash | Loungewear, premium tees |
| Nylon elastane | Strong, stretch, quick dry, abrasion resistant | Costly, less absorbent, heat sensitive | Swimwear, lingerie, activewear |
| Recycled polyester | Performance plus sustainability story | Higher cost, variable hand, traceability needed | Brands with a sustainability claim |
A specification reading “cotton blend” is not a specification. The ratio changes the hand, the shrinkage, the cost and the dye behaviour, and a mill will quote a different price for 60/40 than for 50/50. Write the ratio, and state whether it refers to the ground yarn, the pile yarn, or the whole fabric — for looped constructions these are frequently different.
Send us both constructions and what you are trying to achieve. We will tell you which one actually fits the use, and where the cheaper option will hold up and where it will not — usually in a sentence, and usually without a development cost.
The useful question is not “how much per metre” but what is in that price. A fabric that is expensive because of a difficult construction will stay expensive; one that is expensive because of a fibre choice or a finishing route may have a cheaper equivalent worth considering. Knowing which is which is what makes a quote negotiable.
| Cost driver | How it shows up | Is there a cheaper route |
|---|---|---|
| Fibre choice | Modal and merino multiples, recycled premium | Sometimes — a different blend is close enough |
| Construction complexity | Multi-layer, backed, dense | Rarely — the construction is the requirement |
| Finishing | Brushing, peeling, coating, waterproofing | Yes, if the finish is decorative rather than functional |
| Width | Wider fabric yields less waste per garment | Yes — often the cheapest saving available |
| Minimum order quantity | Small runs priced per metre | Yes — consolidate with another colour or style |
| Sampling | Deps, development slots, custom colours | Partly — stock colourways avoid this entirely |
Certification is where most B2B fabric programmes quietly break, because the mill and the buyer often assume the other side is handling it. The actual practice is that both sides assume the opposite. Whatever the certification situation is, it belongs in writing in the specification and the purchase order, including the certificate number and its validity period — not in a conversation that happened once.
| What to request | Why it matters | What a buyer should check |
|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX Standard 100 | Chemical safety for skin contact | Certificate number and expiry, not just the name |
| GRS or GOTS | Recycled or organic claim substantiation | Scope certificate covers your product, not the mill |
| Colour fastness results | Predicts how goods look after wash and sweat | Test method and the value achieved |
| Dimensional stability | Predicts shrinkage in size | Tested on the finished fabric, after finishing |
| Pilling test result | Predicts surface appearance after wear | Martindale or equivalent, and the rating |
| SGS or third-party report | Independent verification | Dated report matching the actual production lot |
These five account for most of the avoidable cost in fabric procurement. None of them are exotic, and all of them are visible in hindsight from the specification document alone.
| Mistake | What happens | How to avoid it |
|---|---|---|
| Quoting weight without a basis | The mill measures on its own basis and the numbers do not match | State finished-fabric GSM and the measurement width |
| Leaving the fibre ratio unwritten | A “cotton blend” arrives at any ratio the mill chooses | Write the ratio and say which yarn it refers to |
| Naming a construction loosely | Chinese terry arrives when French terry was specified | Use the full construction name, including face and back |
| Treating width as a formality | Waste per garment silently rises and the cost per garment climbs | Specify cuttable width, not greige width |
| Ordering without a shrinkage expectation | Goods pass inspection and fail at the first wash | State the tested shrinkage or the cycle it was tested on |
Quotes arrive in different currencies, on different bases, with different inclusions, and comparing them directly is one of the more reliable ways to make the wrong decision. A quote that looks 15% cheaper than another may be quoting a narrower width, excluding the finishing route, or pricing at a weight the mill does not intend to deliver.
| Item to normalise | What a comparable quote must state |
|---|---|
| Currency and incoterms | Currency, and whether the price is FOB, EXW or delivered |
| Width | Cuttable width in cm, not greige width |
| GSM basis | Finished weight, and the measurement method |
| Finishing | Which routes are included in the price |
| MOQ | Per colour and per fabric, not a total order minimum |
| Lead time | From deposit to ready goods, and whether it is guaranteed |
| Sample cost | Whether the sample charge is credited against the bulk order |
Once the above are normalised, the remaining differences are usually real: fibre quality, construction density, and how much development work the mill has done. Those are the reasons a price difference exists at all, and they are worth paying for when the end use is visible in the finished garment. They are not worth paying for when the difference is only in how the two quotes were written.
If two mills have quoted the same specification and the prices differ by more than about 20% after normalisation, it is worth asking each of them what is different. Occasionally the answer is a cheaper yarn substitution that was never written down.
Most fabric programmes run into trouble twice: once when the sample does not match the brief, and again when the bulk does not match the approved sample. Both are avoidable, and the avoidance is procedural rather than technical.
| Stage | What should be fixed | What can still move |
|---|---|---|
| Development sample | Construction, fibre, weight target, finish | Exact GSM, exact colour |
| Lab dip | Colour direction, hand feel | Shade depth between dips |
| Bulk sample | The approved shade and hand | Minor GSM variation within tolerance |
| Production | The approved bulk sample | Shade variation between dye lots |
Most fabric disputes are settled by a document that did not exist when the order was placed. The following checklist covers the items that we see cause problems most often, in roughly the order they come up.
| Check | What it must state | Why it prevents a problem |
|---|---|---|
| Construction | Full name and whether backed or single-face | The largest source of wrong-fabric deliveries |
| Weight | GSM on the finished fabric, and the measurement width | Mills quote on different bases |
| Fibre | Ratio per yarn, not just the blend name | Changes hand, shrinkage and price |
| Width | Usable cuttable width, not greige width | Waste calculation depends on it |
| Finish | Which finishing routes are applied | Affects both hand and weight |
| Shrinkage | Tested or expected, and on what cycle | The most common cause of returned goods |
| Tolerance | Accepted GSM and width tolerance | Without it, every metre is a dispute |
| MOQ and lead time | Per colour, per fabric | Drives the whole production plan |
Collected, the whole decision process reduces to four questions asked in order. If you answer them in this sequence, the fabric you end up with will usually be the obvious one, and the specification will be short enough to be unambiguous.
1. What is the end use? Garment, home, lining, or bag. This eliminates most constructions immediately.
2. What construction does that end use require? Not what fabric name you have in mind — what the construction has to do to survive that use.
3. What weight, fibre and finish? In that order, because each one constrains the next. Weight before fibre, fibre before finish.
4. What is the tolerance and the MOQ? This is the step most buyers leave until the order is placed, and it is the step that determines whether the delivery is accepted.
Send the end use, the target weight, the width and the quantity, and we will tell you what is runnable on our machines, what it costs, and what the lead time is. If your specification is still open, tell us which variables are fixed and which are not — that single distinction lets us quote alternatives properly.
Once the construction is settled, these guides go deeper on the specific behaviour of each fabric type — what changes between sample and bulk, how to write the specification, and what to check on receipt.
| Construction | Guide |
|---|---|
| French terry and loopback sweatshirt fabrics | French Terry Fabric: Types, GSM & Sourcing |
| Interlock and premium jersey | Jacquard Jersey Fabric: The Structured Stretch Solution |
| Patterned knits | Jacquard Double Knit: The Structured Fabric |
| Antimicrobial performance fabrics | Anti-bacterial Fabric: How Antimicrobial Finishes Work |
| Tricot and stretch linings | Jersey Knit Fabric: The Essential Guide |
280 to 400 GSM is the production range for sweatshirt bodies. Below 280 the fabric lacks body and drapes rather than holds its shape; above 400 it becomes heavy and stiff. For a midweight sweatshirt, 300 to 340 GSM French terry is the most common specification, and 320 to 360 GSM loopback if you want more structure and better recovery.
On the finished fabric. Any finishing route that relaxes, brushes, dyes or calenders the fabric will move the number, sometimes by 10% or more. If you specify greige GSM and receive finished fabric that measures differently, the fabric is not defective — the specification was simply measuring a different thing.
No. GSM is a consequence of yarn, construction and finishing, not a dial you can set separately. What you can change is the route to the same weight: a heavier yarn in the same construction, or the same yarn in a denser construction. Both change the hand, which is usually more visible than the weight difference you were trying to avoid.
Plus or minus 5% is normal and achievable for most constructions. Anything tighter than plus or minus 3% on a production order will either carry a premium or get quietly relaxed without notification, so it is worth asking for the tolerance rather than assuming it.
Yes, and the sample should be from the actual production lot or at least from the same loom and finishing route. A sample made on a different machine will feel different in ways that are hard to predict, which is why handloom and bulk fabric often disappoint on first receipt. Our guide to French terry covers how sample-to-bulk movement happens and which two variables routinely move.
Usually, yes. Our knitting floor covers the main weft-knit constructions, and a great deal of what we quote is development rather than stock. The variables that decide feasibility are weight, width, yarn availability and the finishing route — send the brief and we will confirm which of those are constraints.
Five things: end use, construction, weight, width and quantity. Add fibre ratio and finishing route if you have them, and add your target price if you want us to tell you whether it is realistic. The more of these you can give, the more useful the quote will be — a quote without construction and weight is a price per metre, not a price for a fabric.
You do not need to know the construction to start the conversation. Tell us what the fabric is for, and we will propose constructions that suit it, quote the runnable options with weights and widths, and tell you plainly which variables are worth fixing before the specification is written.
Reviewed by the production team at Shaoxing Keqiao Lianyang Fabric Co., Ltd (Pura Fabric) — a weft-knit fabric manufacturer established in 2010 in Keqiao, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China. Send us your construction, target GSM, width and quantity and we will confirm what is runnable and quote within 12 hours.
[…] Fabric Sourcing Guide: Use to Weight to Construction […]
[…] Fabric Sourcing Guide: Use to Weight to Construction […]